What part of "No" do you not understand?

Mr. Bill doesn't seem to understand that several people have been backing up his posts and tweets against the day that the defense of truth would be needed because of his silly claims of defamation.

From the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure …
Service - Certificate of Service. - A certificate of service shall accompany every pleading and every paper required to be served on any party or nonparty to the litigation, except with respect to pleadings and papers whose service is governed by Rule 4. The certificate shall show the date and method of service or the date of acceptance of service and shall show the name and service address of each person upon whom the paper has been served. If one or more persons are served by facsimile transmission, the certificate shall also show the telefacsimile number of each person so served. Each certificate of service shall be signed in accordance with and subject to Rule 11 of these rules.



Guess what Mr. Bill didn't include with his motion to dismiss the Palmer v. Schmalfeldt protective order petition.

A tip of the hat to @BKWatch for the suggestion.

I seems that Aaron Walker has had enough of Brett's lawfare.

Kimberlin v. Walker (peace order and appeal), Kimberlin v. Walker 2 (peace order and appeal), Kimberlin v. Norton (peace order and appeal), Kimberlin v. Walker, et al., Kimberlin v. National Bloggers Club, et al. (federal suit and appeal), Kimberlin v. Home Depot, Kimberlin v. Hoge (peace order and appeal), State v. Walker (electronic harassment), and State v. Hoge (electronic harassment) have all failed. How long will it be before the remaining cases follow them?

As the wheels fall off of Team Kimberlin's various lawfare efforts …

Brett writes looooong complaints accusing sometimes dozens of defendants with multiple offenses, and he has yet to win anything in the end.

Brett has lost another round in court. We can hardly wait to hear how Bunny Boy and Ankle Biter Willie will spin it as a win.

The single claim remaining against a single defendant is all that is left of Brett's first racketeering LOLsuit. The parties are now going through discovery.

Brett screwed up discovery in the state LOLsuit he lost in 2014. Looking at the stuff published at Hogewash, it seems that he tried to use it as a fishing expedition on matters unrelated to his case, and, of course, he was unsuccessful in his attempt at stonewalling the answers to the defendants' discovery. Does anyone know if he ever paid the sanction for diddling with discovery in that case?

He's dodged the discovery bullet so far in his first racketeering case. So far. It will be interesting to see what Patterico seeks.



There are interesting times ahead.

Brett's appeal of the dismissal of his racketeering LOLsuit is collecting informal response briefs and, now, a motion for sanctions.

Brett has screwed up. He has tried to use Neal Rauhauser's theory of lawfare against the wrong people. He's finding that some media organizations are willing to go to the mat for the First Amendment, that there are dedicated lawyers willing to work pro bono to defend the First Amendment, and that some bloggers are willing to engage him as pro se litigants at low cost. Lawfare works in some cases because in some case the process becomes the punishment. Brett is seeing that turned back on him.

Mr. Bill has spent a decade or more being a jerk on the Interwebz. He's made no real friends and a substantial number of enemies. He has engaged in harassment and cyberstalking. He has engaged in defamation. He has filed false and malicious lawsuits. And now, he is upset because some of the few people who still follow his antics on the Twitterz and his blog du jour are giving him a weak dose of his own medicine.

We don't necessarily approve of everything that Mr. Bill's critics have done to give him back a little of what they've received, but we can say that we haven't seen much go by that Mr. Bill didn't deserve.

Like most other bullies, Mr. Bill is a cry baby when confronted, and his cry boils down to: "No fair. You hit me back."

Yes, Mr. Bill has been hit back. A little bit. Weakly. It would be wise for him to break off before someone decides to follow the advice about hitting back twice as hard.

It would be wise, but stupid is as stupid does.

We read the copy of Brett's brief that he filed with the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. We also went to the court's website and read the instructions on how to file the sort of brief the court ordered him to file.

Bwahahahahahahahahahahaha!

… or just plain stupid?

So Brett wan't able to represent his daughter at the peace order trial against W. J. J. Hoge last Thursday. He continues to bat 1000 at losing.



It's almost enough to make us wonder why Brett keeps sticking to a losing strategy.

Funny you should ask. We have heard that the topic came up at all. Perhaps, Mr. Bill knows.

Two peace orders against Aaron Walker. A peace order against John Norton. The LOLsuit against Walker, Hoge, McCain, Ali, and the Original Kimberlin Unmasked. The racketeering against two dozen defendants. The rip off suit against Home Depot.

Every single one was a loser for Brett, and he still keeps filing 'em.

… to the ram battering through the wall.

Mr. Bill acts as if he is in a position of overwhelming advantage, just like he did in 2013 …



BTW, this is another set of panels ripped off from the Original Kimberlin Unmasked.

One of the things Brett has sued so many people over is his being dropped from a State Department program because of truthful report about his being the Speedway Bomber. It's as if he thinks it was unreasonable for the State Department to be concerned about the optics of a convicted serial bomber training "activists" from the Middle East.

Of course, Brett does have the resources of his "charities" …

When Brett tried to control his reputation via lawfare, he managed to bluff a few people into submission, but the losses he's suffered (he's 0 for 3 against Hoge and 0 for 4 against Walker) show that he's pretty much a humbug.

Unlike the Wizard, Brett is not benign. He's shown that by including defendant's he had settled with in his appeal of his racketeering lawsuit. Not only is he a humbug, he's looks to be a backstabbing one.



Brett and his team of cyberstalking thugs can still engage in harassment. However, they're becoming more trouble than they're worth to those who once found them useful. Diddling with Twitter account now pretty much all they have left that works. Meanwhile, Brett's opposition has discovered that they are the ones with hearts and brains and courage.

Brett sought a million dollars in damages with his first state lawsuit. He lost.



There is probably no truth to the rumor that Brett is being considered for the role of Mini-Me in the Austin Powers remake.

Inspired by the title suggestion from Paul Krendler.

Only in the sense that he's trying to get the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals to review his loss of his racketeering lawsuit …

We are developing an appreciation for the writing style of Patterico's lawyer Ron Coleman.

We are disappointed to hear that Mr. Bill wasn't found guilty of violating W. J. J. Hoge's peace order today. However, after reading Aaron Walker's account of the proceeding, we have the impression that Mr. Bill may not have helped his overall legal position by some of things he may have said in court today. It would be interesting to hear the Court audio. We may have to order a copy.



We weren't surprised by the outcome of today's trial. It seems that Team Kimberlin usually wins in the District Court in Maryland. Given Walker's comment about Hoge reopening the Circuit Court case, we wonder what Hoge has up his sleeve?

Brett claims to be one of several million customers of Home Deposit whose credit cards accounts were affected by a data breach at Home Depot. Yeah, big deal. It happened to one of us too. Brett is suing.



We wonder it this suit would have been filed if Home Depot were one of the companies donating building supplies to Brett's Green Casa Maryland project?

C.O.U.R.T.S. to Brett: All your base are belong to us.



KU adds: You have no chance to survive make your time. Ha Ha Ha Ha …

Brett loses yet another motion with no basis in either the facts or the law. His motion for a new trial in the state case against Walker, Hoge, McCain, and Akbar has been denied.

We can remember Team Kimberlin making fun of W. J. J. Hoge's use of res judicata during the hearing on Schmalfeldt's motion to amend the first peace order, but Hoge won. Aaron Walker, Stacy McCain, and Hoge also used res judicata as one element of their defenses against Brett's racketeering suit, saying that their earlier win in state court settled certain issues.

Now Brett wants to try his hand at using it to prevent Dan Backer and DB Capitol Strategies from seeking attorneys' fee in the racketeering case, but …

Note: The title was ripped of from Dr_Mike's comment on this subject at Hogewash.

So Brett let the deadline to oppose Hogie-Wan's motion to dismiss the Electric Boogaloo racketeering lawsuit go by without filing anything with the court. We're guessing that he's figured out that his complaint is a disaster and that he's busy trying to put together an amended complaint. Also, after the same judge just bench slapped him over having Hoge in the first racketeering suit, Brett may have figured out that letting Hoge go saves his claim of the court having diversity jurisdiction. (Brett and Hoge both live in Maryland; diversity requires that no plaintiff live in the same state as any of the defendants.)



Or maybe Stacy McCain is right, and Brett is really The World's Worst Pro Se Litigant™.

"Kimberlin has failed." "Plaintiff is mistaken." No wonder Brett doesn't cite proper legal authorities …

Mr. Bill is certainly full of himself …

#Loser

Does Brett know the difference between a Marshal and a Marshall?

Amazing brand loyalty …

Continuing with our Downfall schtick …

And the fool filed another racketeering lawsuit yesterday …

As a former editor of Breitbart Unmasked sometimes says, "Oopsie Poopsie!"

Brett had his ass handed to him again in court this week. And in other breaking news, water is wet and the Pope is Catholic.

Or maybe not …

Some younger people may not recognize the character shown below. It's Hamilton Burger, the DA in the original Perry Mason TV series. Of course, Mason won almost every time, but Burger actual won two cases on their merits during the 9 year run of the series.

Willie Ferguson is beclowning himself again as a spokesman for Acme Law.

None of us are lawyers, but the one we checked with told us that it appears that Stacy McCain's reply that was filed earlier this week should be the last court paper normally allowed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure relating to the motions to dismiss Brett's racketeering lawsuit. If that's the case, the judge can now rule on those motions without short-circuiting any party's right to be heard.

Stacy McCain has referred to Brett as The World's Worst Pro Se Litigant™. Given Mr. Bill's performance, McCain may have Brett a notch lower than he deserves, but it's clear that Pro Se Brett isn't much of a match for Pro Se McCain.

About a year ago, Brett went crying to the judge in his racketeering case for extra time because of snow days.

Really. He did.

This year, he seems to have got ahead of the weather.



The recycled image from the Original Kimberlin Unmasked is used without permission.

While looking through the online docket of Brett's racketeering case on PACER, it doesn't take long before it's obvious that Brett believes "the rules" don't apply to him. By "the rules" we mean any rules—the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Evidence, the court's Local Rules, or, especially, the rules of logic.

Our spycam in the Brettbunker passed this along. Given what's happened during the past few weeks, we suspect that Brett may be losing patience with Mr. Bill.

Brett talked about his attempts to have Mr. Bill harass us by getting our Twitter accounts suspended in the opposition he filed to Stacy McCain's motion to dismiss Brett's racketeering lawsuit. He said that he's waiting for our @WatchfulAvenger account to be taken down.

It hasn't happened yet.



Heh. It looks like his Frankenstein Monster of a case is getting away from him.

Last year, Brett complained to the judge in his racketeering case that some of the defendants had said mean things about him on the Interwebz. The judge was not impressed. Brett's trying the same thing again.

The title of this post was inspired by a quote from the physicist Wolfgang Pauli that we saw over at Hogewash. When we read Brett opposition to Stacy McCain's motion to dismiss, we were amazed to see how scatterbrained it is, even for one of Brett's filings. We weren't amazed at its meanness. Given Brett's history, …

Brett has filed an opposition to Stacy McCain's motion to dismiss, and it turns out that we have a supporting role in the drama.



We note that the message was forwarded to Brett. Our working hypothesis is that Mr. Bill was the person who initiated the bogus complaint with Twitter.

There's been a lot of comments on the Interwebz that have been critical of how the court has handled motions and such for Brett's federal racketeering lawsuit. While we haven't agreed with everything the court has done, we are encouraged that Judge Hazel knows that he dealing with a liar for a plaintiff. This comment from a footnote in one of his orders indicates that he is getting a good grip on the case.

We're betting on the Zombie coming out ahead in Mr. Bill's LOLsuit.

Forgery runs throughout Team Kimberlin. Brett's been caught during the past year forging court documents.



Given that a forgery conviction figures into the 51+ year aggregated sentence Brett received and given that his unsupervised parole extend to the end of his sentence in 2030, engaging in forgery is kind of risky behavior on his part.

Here are some scenes from the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. trial that demonstrate his courtroom klutziness.

It's obvious from his record that Brett is a lousy litigator. He doesn't know how to present his case effectively, and he seems to know even less about how to prepare it.

He had this exchange during a hearing that resulted in 5 of the 7 claims in his state lawsuit against Walker, et al. being thrown out on summary judgment.

Mr. Bill is grasping at straws, trying to find some way of "proving" that all of his contacts with W. J. J. Hoge in violation of the current peace order were forged or done by someone else or whatever the excuse-of-the-day he's trying to peddle.

He's now trying to show that there's an online prank service that sends the message Hoge received and that he had nothing to do with anything.



Here are a few points to consider:

1. Hoge has never introduced the voicemail into evidence in any proceeding. That Mr. Bill would get so spun up about it reminds us of the reference to Proverbs 28:1 at the end of the Johnny Atsign episodes.

2. Even if the call were routed through the prank call site, that doesn't mean that Mr. Bill isn't the voice actor who recorded it or that he didn't initiate the call to Hoge's phone.

3. We called Hoge's phone (as listed at Hogewash) and timed voicemail message to the point where the tone beeps. While that time is consistent with the gag call beginning as soon as the line picked up and running over Hoge's voice mail greeting, the voicemail message ending before the rest of the gag script plays is suspicious.

Of course, if could be that Sluggo told Mr. Hand to make the call to get Mr. Bill in trouble.

If Mr. Bill really didn't mail that letter to Hoge, maybe he didn't mail that LOLsuit to the court.



Are the signature too much alike, not enough alike, or …

Actually, it's more of a LMAOsuit.

There are certain themes that recur throughout Brett's life …

There are rule of evidence that apply in a court of law. They determine what is and isn't admissible in a proceeding. Brett's failure to play by the rules has meant that much of his "evidence" never gets before the court. For example, consider this exchange from last summer's defamation trial …

Mr. Bill has announced that he's filed a federal lawsuit against a yet-to-be-revealed laundry list of nasty people who have been writing things about him in the comment sections of Hogewash and Thinking Man's Zombie. Mr. Bill filed a similar suit last year, but withdrew it after only a few days when he found that he would have to pay the filing fee.



We hope to be able to contain our sense of butthurt if we aren't included among the defendants.

Looking back over the suspicions related to "Jessica," the murder of her grandmother, the presumed connections between that murder and the Speedway Bombings, Mrs. Kimberlin's allegation of statutory rape, etc., it's interesting to see what Brett complained of during a hearing in his state lawsuit last year.

We managed to listen in on a recent strategy session in the Brettbunker (aka Mom’s Basement) …

Brett has been screwing up service of process left and right in all of his recent lawfare. It appears that he neglected to serve Stacy McCain with the second amended complaint in his federal racketeering lawsuit within the time allowed, but is trying to have McCain found in default anyway.

McCain is pointing out that Brett doesn’t even have forged evidence to support that claim.



Pro Tip: Never try to outcrazy Stacy McCain.

Brett is making some interesting unforced errors in his federal racketeering lawsuit.

Brett has filed his massive state and federal lawsuits complaining of a vast conspiracy to do him harm, but when pressed about who did what, when they did it, and how he was damaged, he never seems to be able to come up with any evidence.

Brett claims that those of us who tell the truth about him are really spinning false narratives. The truth is, Brett is a liar and the source all the falsity, lies, and bullshit associated with him and his lawfare.

One of the defendants in Brett’s racketeering lawsuit is a journalist named Mandy Nagy. Ms. Nagy suffered a stroke last year and is slowly recovering. Because of her enormous medical bills, she will probably be judgment proof for the rest of her life. Even if he were to win the suit against her, he’d never receive a dime. Since Ms. Nagy is not able to participate in her own defense, Brett is seek to have her mother substituted as defendant on Ms. Nagy’s behalf.



This is a marvelous example of the kind of legal terrorism Brett engages in.

Brett has filed a letter with the judge in his racketeering lawsuit asking to reopen the case with respect to Lynn Thomas. Mrs. Thomas was the individual that he named as Kimberlin Unmasked in that case. Although he reached a settlement with here and dismissed her fro the case, he wants to punish her because of the existence of this website.

Mrs. Thomas has nothing to do with the current version of Kimberlin Unmasked.

All of the original material found here and on the companion Twitter account has been lifted from the Internet. (Google and The Wayback Machine are very useful.)



Brett should rein in his petty meanness before it caused him more trouble than he can imagine.

Brett is a loser, and he doesn’t like it.

He thought he had worked out a great deal to shut down the satirical criticism coming from Kimberlin Unmasked, but he didn’t figure all the angles. The Original Kimberlin Unmasked site is gone, but we’ve taken its place. The Original @kimberlinunmask Twitter account was closed, but we grabbed the handle before Brett could. Now, he’s trying to punish Lynn Thomas, one of the people he claims was part of the Original Kimberlin Unmasked for his lack of foresight.



This will not work out well for Brett.

Brett should have picked on someone his own size. We suppose his problem was finding someone of small enough stature.





Patterico, Aaron Walker, Ali Akbar, W. J. J. Hoge, (non-party) Ace, and Stacy McCain aren’t the only defendants pushing back twice as hard.

Mr. Bill isn’t the only member of Team Kimberlin who’s lawfare is falling on hard times. Brett lost his state defamation suit against Walker, et al., and he’s now well on his way to losing his federal racketeering lawsuit. It’s one thing to lose a lawsuit. It’s something else to lose and be sanctioned—and the remaining defendants in the racketeering suit all seem to be looking for sanctions against Brett. Given that he has forged a summons and altered evidence, sanctions are a real possibility.



The graphic is from the Original Kimberlin Unmasked and is used without permission.

Neal Rauhauser’s Theory of Lawfare didn’t allow for defendants who punch back twice as hard. Or harder.

Now that Brett has lost his state Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. lawsuit and is well on the way to losing his federal racketeering case, we wonder if he’s stopped to count the cost of his lawfare. He spent over a year suing the people he believed were Kimberlin Unmasked, settling that case—and then seeing this website appear.



Hoge used to ask how Brett thought his brass knuckles reputation management was working. From our point of view, it’s failing. Miserably.

Brett has tried to get information about his enemies into court documents because they are public records that can be published (unless they are sealed). Just think of the acres of paperwork about Brett now available because he chose to vexatiously sue a couple of dozen defendants in his federal racketeering lawsuit.



We wonder if the Streisand Effect should be renamed in Brett honor?

Brett’s loss in a Maryland state court last August didn’t seem to teach him the right lesson.



Now, he not only has no evidence, he has a settled lawsuit. We bet that Hoge won’t be the only defendant in the federal racketeering lawsuit who raises the doctrine of res judicata.

Does he even care? Or is it really random, unfocused terrorism just like the Speedway Bombings?



Brett was unable to shutdown Kimberlin Unmasked with his lawfare. He looks to be headed to a similar disaster in his bumbling attempt to identify “Ace.” His suit names a blog called “Ace of Spades.” The actual name of the blog we think he wanted to target is “Ace of Spades HQ,” and we think the anonymous blogger he wanted to target is called “Ace.” With no more amendments allowed to his complaint, he stuck suing what he sued originally, a possibly non-existent entity.

Brett has put the “Doh!” in John Doe.

Speaking of things that Brett doesn’t want people to talk about …

Brett hasn’t won a single case he’s filed that made it to the Circuit Court in Montgomery County.



BTW, Brett was forced to drop his peace order petition against John Norton when it was appealed to the Circuit Court, and he lost the appeal of the protective order petition he filed against his wife.

And Another Thing—The common theme through all his losing lawsuits is claims presented without any evidence to back them.

There’s a year-in-review feature about Team Kimberlin going over at Hogewash, and the top story for August deals with Brett’s loss in the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. lawsuit. The post mentions that Glenn Reynolds opined that Brett biggest mistake was trying to outcrazy Stacy McCain. Here’s an excerpt from the trial transcript that supports Instapundit’s analysis.

After Brett tried unsuccessfully to introduce irrelevant information to try to paint McCain as a racist, Ali Akbar (who is black) used his cross examination of McCain to refute Brett’s innuendo. The following exchange occurred during Brett’s attempt at redirect examination.



BTW, Eric Johnson, the judge who heard the case, is black.

Brett whined about his face being photoshopped onto a Nazi uniform in his nonsensical copyright lawsuit against the Original Kimberlin Unmasked. What has that lawsuit bought him? More Streisand Effect, that’s what.

Brett can sue, but he can’t hide his past. Brett can sue, but he can’t stop people from publicizing his present activities. Brett can sue, but he can’t win.



Brett didn’t like his face on a Hitler Youth uniform. No problem. We’ve promoted him to the big guy himself and made him the star of his own Downfall parodies. And his buddies are all getting supporting roles: Rauhauser as Goebbels, Mr. Bill as Bormann, Bunny Boy as Burgdorf, and others to follow.

The Original Kimberlin Unmasked artwork is used without permission.

If you want to know what the real burr under Brett’s saddle is, you should read the transcript of the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. lawsuit and pay attention to the questions he asked his daughter when he put her on the stand.

The Hogie-Wan image is from the Original Kimberlin Unmasked and is used without permission.

And there are more Downfall themed posts to come.

Imagine the scene in the Brettbunker (aka, Mom’s Basement) when Brett finds out that the legal doctrine of res judicata applies in his federal racketeering lawsuit to the defendants who beat him in state court. That doctrine says that once a matter is decided, it’s decided. Final decisions are final and not to be tried again in another court.

Back in 2012, Brett claimed that a guy named John Norton had been lurking in the bushes around his mom’s house (where Brett lives in the basement) and that Norton had taken pictures of Brett and his daughter. Brett managed to get a peace order, but it was overturned on appeal when Brett withdrew his petition rather than have to testify under oath about what actually happened.

Brett is still lying about what happened.

The transcript of the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. trial can be found online. It’s a very clear demonstration that reason Brett has lost almost all of this “over a hundred” lawsuits is that he has no idea how to effectively make his case before a judge or jury. Very early in his examination of Aaron Walker, he gave Walker a chance to explain why Brett’s case was phony.

Brett’s complaint names a blog called “Ace of Spades” as a defendant in his federal racketeering lawsuit. That has created a bit of a problem for him.

While reading through Brett’s recently filed opposition to the motions to dismiss his federal racketeering lawsuit, we were struck by his claim that the court should rule against the defendants because they have not proved their innocence.

Brett has filed and lost over a hundred lawsuits, so he probably understands that his federal racketeering lawsuit is as much a loser as the state case he filed against Aaron Walker, W. J. J. Hoge, Stacy McCain, Ali Akbar, and Kimberlin Unmasked. (That would be the Original Kimberlin Unmasked, not us.) He’s managed to con some of the federal defendants into settling with him, and he’s gained some shutuppery at the margins.

He wasn’t very smart in the way he structured his settlement with the two people he thought were the Original Kimberlin Unmasked. He asked for some stuff that they were willing to give him, but it turned out that he blew it. We don’t know the terms of that settlement, and, so far as we know, the alleged Original Kimberlin Unmasked people have lived up to their part of the bargain, but it’s clear from the existence of this blog and the revived @Kimberlinunmask Twitter account that Brett didn’t get what he really wanted.



We don’t have a dog, pro se or otherwise, in that fight, but we are rooting for one side over the other. We hope that the other defendants will stick it out until Brett’s lawfare is defeated. Meanwhile, we intend to have more fun at Brett’s expense and the expense of the other members of Team Kimberlin.

Brett’s sense of entitlement causes him to believe that any adverse statements made about him should be subject to legal sanctions.



The Hogie-Wan image is from the Original Kimberlin Unmasked and is used without permission.

A letter has surfaced that appears to be from Brett to the judge in his federal racketeering lawsuit. It isn’t shown on the case docket yet. In the letter Brett whines about Patterico commenting on the case on his blog and asks for sanctions. He tried the same trick earlier this year, and the judge told him he had no basis for his complaining.

The parody For What It’s Worth parody lyrics are by W. J. J. Hoge and are used without permission.

Brett and Team Kimberlin haven’t a clue who is behind this blog. A penny for their thoughts on the matter would be overpayment. Meanwhile, our fun with their follies continues …



The parody For What It’s Worth lyrics are by W. J. J. Hoge and are used without permission.

Here’s another example of Brett using an exhibit which not only doesn’t support his allegation—it refutes his story.

Brett had lots of extra time (with the two extensions he was granted) to craft his omnibus opposition to the motions to dismiss his racketeering lawsuit. And yet, it seems to be a rushed and disjointed effort.

Brett’s PR website hasn’t offered much coverage of his legal crusade against all those mean, nasty RWNJs who’ve been telling the truth about him—especially since he’s been losing.

Brett has filed his omnibus opposition to all the motions to dismiss his federal racketeering lawsuit. And now, the defendants contemplate their replies.

Brett may have filed over a hundred lawsuits, but he’s won almost none of them. His amazing inadvertent admission in his motion for a new trial in the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. case—that the defendants had published factual information about him—shows how poorly he plans. In order to prove his case, he must show that the defendants’ statements were false. But if they’re factual …



No wonder he’s such a loser.

Time is almost up for Brett to get his paperwork in to oppose the pile of motions to dismiss his racketeering lawsuit.



Last year, Brett moaned about having to get court papers filed during the Christmas holiday season. This year, the defendants will be the ones working through Christmas and New Year’s. Brett probably thinks that is some sort of victory.

The Hogie-Wan image is from the Original Kimberlin Unmasked and is used without permission.

Poor Brett! He claims that the Defendants he is suing in his federal racketeering case have injured his mental well-being.



Brett has until until the court closes on Monday to file his opposition to all of the motions to dismiss his lawsuit. Since he has dismissed the suit (with prejudice) against the individuals he claimed were Kimberlin Unmasked and since we have not been served with anything, Kimberlin Unmasked no longer considers itself a party to the lawsuit. Still, we are interested, and we look forward to reading his not-to-exceed-50-page document.

One of the major goals of Brett’s lawfare is to identify his perceived enemies who speak and write about him anonymously of pseudonymously. He has been after the blogger Ace who blogs at Ace of Spades HQ for several years. All this year, he has been outmaneuvered at every turn by Ace and his legal counsels. One problem that Brett has is that he identified the Ace of Spades blog rather than any person as the defendant in his RICO lawsuit.

David Weigel reported that immediately after losing the Kimberlin v. Walker, et al. trial last August, Brett proclaimed eternal lawfare against the defendants in that case. Since then, he has dropped that suit against the two individuals that he thought were the Original Kimberlin Unmasked, thinking that in doing so he would shutdown Kimberlin Unmasked. Brett is an even worse strategist than he is a lawyer.

He’s now trying to extend his lawfare against the other defendants. First, he appealed the case. Now, he’s asking for a new trial.



Even if you get a new trial, you’ll still have to find some admissible, probative evidence, Brett. Get ready to lose again. Motion, appeal, trial, whatever.

Brett Kimberlin has been cluttering up the docket of his racketeering lawsuit against the National Bloggers Club and 23 19 other defendants. He has been hit with ten or so motions to dismiss, and the judge has ordered him to file a single “omnibus” opposition memorandum. It was originally due in October, but it’s now due next Monday.

In recognitions of that deadline, Kimberlin Unmasked offers the following song parody. The words are by John Hoge. The first panel is from the Original Kimberlin Unmasked. Both are used without permission. The second panel of from the original site is not available, but we were able to find a cover version by Op-Critical.





Come on, come on, do the loco motions with me.

Brett Kimberlin thought that he could permanently silence one of the voices raised against him.



I’m reasonably certain that Brett will try to shut down this site.

“If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can imagine.”